Terms of the Hunt

The fol­low­ing excerpt is from A View to a Death in the Morn­ing by Matt Cart­mill. My sis­ter sent me the excerpt and said the book’s aim was to “trace the his­tory of the sym­bol­ism of hunt­ing (mostly in the West) and changes in humanity’s under­stand­ing of nature as it relates to hunt­ing, so as to exam­ine the his­tor­i­cal prece­dents of the the­ory that hunt­ing is what made man man, dis­tin­guished from nature in his ten­dency toward vio­lence (pop­u­larly known as the the­ory of ‘Man the Hunter’).” So cool!

The fan­tas­tic and amus­ing terms that Eliz­a­bethan hunts­men applied to group­ings of dif­fer­ent species—a sloth of bears, an exal­ta­tion of larks, a trip of goats, a richesse of martens—are famil­iar today to lovers of quaint words. Every other aspect of aris­to­cratic hunt also afforded a dif­fer­ent lex­i­con for each species of game. For exam­ple, a male fal­low deer dur­ing its first six years of life was known suc­ces­sively as a fawn, pricket, sorel, sore, buck of the first head, and buck, while the cor­re­spond­ing terms for a red deer were calf, brocket, spade, stag­gart, stag, and hart…The unhappy hunter who used the wrong pro­noun to the dogs, called a brocket a pricket, or said “raise” when he meant “rouse” sel­dom escaped with mere deri­sion. A pub­lic spank­ing with the flat of a hunt­ing knife was the cus­tom­ary penalty for many such mis­uses of rit­ual language—for exam­ple, utter­ing the for­bid­den word “hedge­hog” dur­ing a deer hunt.

pg 64–65

  • Share/Bookmark

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you sub­scribe to my RSS feed!

No Comments

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *